About me

What you should know about me:

I own a pet cat, love cheesy action and horror movies, occasionally watch hockey, love listening to pretty any kind of music, hard rock, classic rock and pop, old school rap, 80's and 90's music, heavy metal, you name it, and I am also from Canada.

Also known as Jamie M.

About voting:

I'll try to get to voting as many lists, as humanly possible, in my spare time.

Since there's alot of awesome lists and pictures, out there I'll try to vote as many times as I can.

About lists that are in work: It will be huge undertaking, so some will take longer than others to finish off.

About the ratings:

***** Great or awesome
****. Good
***. Decent or Ok
**. Meh
*. It stinks!
No Stars. You get the idea.

Recent reviews

Lists

1 votes Why the Box Office Bomb?: Films of 1980s: 1982 (19 items) Movie list by Agent Kermit D. Fonz Published 6 days, 6 hours ago 2 votes Why The Box Office?: Films of 1980s: 1982 (50 items) Movie list by Agent Kermit D. Fonz Published 6 days, 5 hours ago 1 votes Why the Box Office?: Films of 1980s: 1981 (46 items) Movie list by Agent Kermit D. Fonz Published 2 weeks, 1 day ago 4 votes Box Office Crunching: 1980’s (6 lists) Movie list by Agent Kermit D. Fonz Published 2 weeks, 6 days ago 3 votes Why The Bomb?: 1980s (3 lists) Movie list by Agent Kermit D. Fonz Published 6 days, 1 hour ago

My feed

Agent Kermit D. Fonz added 1 item to Why The Box Office?: Films of 1980s: 1982 list

The Year of Living Dangerously was only a modest box office hit because it was a dense, politically complex historical drama that targeted a mature audience rather than mainstream moviegoers. While the film was highly acclaimed and earned Linda Hunt an Academy Award, several factors shaped its financial performance: The Box Office Numbers The movie was one of the most ambitious and expensive Australian productions of its era, but its specialized subject matter limited its commercial reach: Budget: A$6 million (roughly equivalent to $13 million USD estimated overall production costs). US & Canada Gross: $10.3 million USD. Australian Gross: A$2.9 million. Why It Wasn't a Massive Blockbuster Challenging Subject Matter: Set during the 1965 attempted overthrow of Indonesian President Sukarno, the heavy focus on foreign journalism, poverty, and complex Cold War politics wasn't geared toward a mass popcorn movie audience. Distribution Strategy: MGM/UA rolled out the film via a limited release in January 1983 before expanding nationwide a month later. This slow rollout built critical prestige but did not generate massive opening-weekend momentum.

[Production Disruptions: While filming in Manila, the production received severe death threats alleging the movie was anti-Islam. The entire cast and crew had to be abruptly relocated to Sydney to finish filming, putting an unexpected financial strain on the project. Despite not breaking box office records, the film did successfully establish Mel Gibson as a prominent international leading man and cemented its legacy through its enduring, culturally embedded title phrase.

1 day ago

Agent Kermit D. Fonz voted for 2 images

1 day, 1 hour ago

Agent Kermit D. Fonz added 4 items to Why The Box Office?: Films of 1980s: 1982 list

1 day, 1 hour ago

Agent Kermit D. Fonz added 2 items to Why the Box Office Bomb?: Films of 1980s: 1982 list

1 day, 23 hours ago

Agent Kermit D. Fonz added 2 items to Why The Box Office?: Films of 1980s: 1982 list

1 day, 23 hours ago

Agent Kermit D. Fonz added 1 item to Why the Box Office Bomb?: Films of 1980s: 1982 list

John Carpenter’s The Thing (released in 1982, though filmed in 1981) originally flopped at the box officebecause it was too dark, gory, and nihilistic for audiences who were craving optimistic sci-fi. It grossed only $19.6 million against a $15 million budget, losing money once marketing costs were factored in. The film's initial failure came down to three major factors: The "E.T." Effect & Aggressive Competition Steven Spielberg’s E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial had been released just two weeks prior. E.T. completely dominated pop culture with its heartwarming, friendly portrayal of alien life. Moviegoers simply did not want to see a shape-shifting alien violently tearing people and dogs apart. A Crowded Summer: The summer of 1982 was packed with legendary genre films. The Thing had to compete directly for ticket sales against Poltergeist, Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan, and Blade Runner. Extreme Critical Backlash Film critics at the time universally despised the movie. Focus on Gore: Critics like Roger Ebert called it "dull" and argued that the groundbreaking practical effects by Rob Bottin were just cheap, repulsive shock value that came at the expense of character development. Insults from the Past: Christian Nyby, the director of the original 1951 adaptation (The Thing from Another World), publicly trashed Carpenter's version, stating, "If you want blood and gore, go to a slaughterhouse." An Overwhelmingly Bleak Tone No Hope: The movie features heavy themes of paranoia, isolation, and absolute distrust. The Ending: It lacks a traditional "Hollywood happy ending." The final scene leaves the survival of the main characters completely ambiguous, which left 1982 audiences feeling depressed and unsatisfied. The Turnaround Despite nearly ruining John Carpenter’s career at the time, The Thing found a second life through VHS rentals and television broadcasts in the late 1980s and 1990s. Today, it is widely re-evaluated as an absolute masterpiece of horror filmmaking, celebrated for having some of the greatest practical visual effects in cinema history.

2 days, 2 hours ago

Agent Kermit D. Fonz voted for an image

2 days, 2 hours ago

Agent Kermit D. Fonz added 4 items to Why The Box Office?: Films of 1980s: 1982 list

2 days, 2 hours ago

Agent Kermit D. Fonz voted for 4 images

2 days, 3 hours ago

Agent Kermit D. Fonz added 9 items to Why The Box Office?: Films of 1980s: 1982 list

2 days, 4 hours ago

Agent Kermit D. Fonz added 1 item to Why The Box Office?: Films of 1980s: 1982 list

The 1982 classic film My Favorite Year was a financial success, grossing $20,123,620 at the domestic box office against an estimated production budget of $7.9 million. While it wasn't a massive blockbuster on the scale of that year's mega-hits like E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial, its performance was highly profitable for several key reasons: Strong Word-of-Mouth: The film resonated heavily with audiences due to its nostalgic, frantic, and fond depiction of 1950s live television writer's rooms. Critical Acclaim & Awards Buzz: The film earned immense critical praise, culminating in an Academy Award nomination for Peter O'Toole for Best Actor. This critical recognition extended its shelf life and steady performance in theatres, eventually ranking as the #36 highest-grossing film of 1982. Star Power and Appeal: Directed by Richard Benjamin in his directorial debut, the story was loosely inspired by executive producer Mel Brooks's real-life experiences writing for Sid Caesar’s Your Show of Shows. Peter O'Toole's unforgettable portrayal of Alan Swann a character heavily based on legendary swashbuckler Errol Flynn became a massive draw for moviegoers.

2 days, 5 hours ago

Agent Kermit D. Fonz added 1 item to Why the Box Office Bomb?: Films of 1980s: 1982 list

Megaforce is historically recorded as one of the most significant box office disasters of 1982. According to tracking data on Box Office Mojo and IMDb, the definitive financial numbers for the film's theatrical run are: Production Budget: $20,000,000 (estimated) Opening Weekend Gross: $2,350,021 (US & Canada, across 1,193 screens) Total Domestic Gross: $5,675,599 Total Worldwide Gross: $5,675,599 (international distribution evaporated after the US failure) The 1982 sci-fi action movie Megaforce flopped at the box office because it suffered from a massive budget, brutal summer competition, terrible critical reviews, and a campy tone that alienated theatre-goers. Backed by a heavy marketing push, the film only managed to claw back $5.7 million against its massive $20 million budget (roughly equivalent to a major blockbuster at the time, exceeding movies like First Blood). The failure can be attributed to several key factors: Unbeatable Summer Competition Megaforce opened on June 25, 1982, right into what is widely considered one of the most competitive blockbuster summers in Hollywood history. It was completely crushed by legendary hits like Steven Spielberg's E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (which was an inescapable cultural phenomenon), Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan, Poltergeist, and Rocky III. To make matters worse, it opened on the exact same day as Ridley Scott's sci-fi masterpiece, Blade Runner. Shameless Toy Commercial Aesthetics The film was heavily funded and influenced by the Mattel Toy Corporation, which actually designed the film's futuristic costumes and vehicles so they could easily be scaled down into action figures and Hot Wheels cars. This corporate tie-in severely backfired. Instead of feeling like a gritty, high-octane action film, the production felt like a cynical, feature-length toy commercial. Overwhelming Camp & Style Choices Director Hal Needham (known for Smokey and the Bandit) tried to craft a loud, high-tech, American answer to James Bond, but producer Albert S. Ruddy opted for a bizarrely campy tone. Lead actor Barry Bostwick was dressed in form-fitting skin-tight gold spandex jumpsuits and a baby-blue scarf, paired with a fluffy, meticulously coiffed hairdo. Audiences looking for a serious action movie were turned off by the sheer silliness and the lead characters' repetitive, bizarre "thumb-kissing" gesture. Poor Visual Effects and Production Chaos Despite its large budget, Megaforce was plagued by financial trouble behind the scenes. The production reportedly ran out of money mid-shoot, prompting pissed-off prop managers to strip the custom movie parts off the film's Suzuki motorcycles and ride away on them as payment. Furthermore, the movie leaned heavily on a primitive green-screen replacement technology called Introvision. While it saved money on physical sets, the resulting optical and visual effects looked cheap, jarring, and poorly integrated on the big screen. Scathing Critical Reviews Critics completely panned the movie. Celebrated critic Roger Ebert famously dismissed it as a collection of "mindless stunts and chase scenes repeating each other over and over". It went on to secure three Golden Raspberry (Razzie) nominations, including Worst Picture and Worst Director. Despite ruining Barr Bostwick's chances at a mainstream action career, Megaforce achieved massive popularity on late-night cable and VHS in the late '80s, cementing its legacy as a beloved, cult classic piece of 1980s cheese. It famously served as the primary blueprint for Trey Parker and Matt Stone's 2004 satirical film, Team America: World Police. The financial failure of Megaforce had a immediate and devastating impact on its studio, Golden Harvest, and sent shockwaves through the industry regarding how Hollywood marketed movies to children. Here is exactly how its failure affected the box office and the film industry at the time: It Nearly Bankrupted Golden Harvest's US Operations The independent Hong Kong studio Golden Harvest (famous for Bruce Lee and Jackie Chan films) invested a staggering $20 million into Megaforce in a massive bid to break into the mainstream American market. Because the film only grossed $5.7 million, the studio lost millions. The disaster forced Golden Harvest to drastically scale back its ambitions for Hollywood distribution, leading them to pivot away from high-budget American sci-fi and stick closer to their proven martial arts roots. The Death of the "Toy-First" Movie Model (Temporarily) In 1982, Megaforce was a massive experiment in corporate synergy. Mattel designed the vehicles and costumes specifically so they could manufacture toys simultaneously. When the movie bombed, the toy line completely tanked, leaving retailers stuck with action figures children didn't want. This disaster scared Hollywood and toy companies away from launching live-action movies purely to sell toys. Instead, the industry shifted this strategy entirely to animation, leading to the boom of 1980s afternoon cartoons like He-Man and Transformers, which were much cheaper to produce and easier to control. It Proved "Camp" Couldn't Compete with Earnest Sci-Fi The summer of 1982 was a turning point for the sci-fi genre. Megaforce attempted to use a goofy, tongue-in-cheek, campy tone. However, the box office returns that summer proved that audiences wanted earnest, high-stakes storytelling. Movies like E.T., The Wrath of Khan, and even the darker Poltergeist dominated because they took their worlds seriously. Megaforce showed studios that audiences would reject high-budget sci-fi if it felt like the filmmakers were treating the concept as a joke. A Blow to the "Stuntman-as-Director" Trend Following the massive success of Smokey and the Bandit and Hooper, Hollywood was eager to let legendary stuntman Hal Needham direct massive films. Megaforce was meant to prove he could handle big-budget, special-effects-heavy sci-fi. Its failure, combined with the lukewarm reception of his other later films, cooled Hollywood's enthusiasm for giving stunt coordinators blank checks to direct massive blockbusters, shifting power back to traditional narrative directors.

2 days, 6 hours ago

Agent Kermit D. Fonz added 3 items to Why The Box Office?: Films of 1980s: 1982 list

2 days, 6 hours ago

Agent Kermit D. Fonz added 2 items to Why the Box Office Bomb?: Films of 1980s: 1982 list

2 days, 19 hours ago

Agent Kermit D. Fonz voted for list

Memorable McFly Quotes (7 music items)

3 days, 8 hours ago

Agent Kermit D. Fonz voted for an image

4 days, 1 hour ago

Agent Kermit D. Fonz voted for an image

4 days, 4 hours ago

Agent Kermit D. Fonz added 1 item to Why The Box Office?: Films of 1980s: 1982 list

The 1982 animated fantasy film The Last Unicorn grossed approximately $6.45 million at the United States box office. Box Office and Financial Performance U.S. Box Office Gross: $6,455,330 Estimated Budget: $3.5 million – $4 million Opening Weekend (US): $2,250,000 Commercial Legacy: Despite being considered a box office disappointment initially, the film developed a massive, enduring cult following over the decades through. At the time of its initial release in 1982, the theatrical experience of The Last Unicorn was a strange mixture of immediate box office strength, abrupt logistical chaos, and a remarkably long, undocumented lifespan in independent theaters. Limited Marketing and the Jensen Farley Rollout Universal Pictures originally held the options to distribute the movie but passed because they weren't confident in the film's unorthodox tone. Instead, the U.S. theatrical rights were sold to a small, independent, Nevada-based distributor called Jensen Farley Pictures. Jensen Farley was incredibly cash-poor and struggled to properly promote the movie. According to archival box office historical analysis from AskMyAcupuncturist, “THE LAST UNICORN did not get a big release -- just 648 screens, at a time when a major Hollywood movie typically opened on 1100-1200 screens. And the film's distributor... was so cash-poor that the nationwide promotional budget was only $231 per screen.” A Surprising, Hidden Box Office Hit Despite the lack of ads, word of mouth among families and fantasy fans was instantly strong. On its opening weekend (November 19, 1982), it managed to rank #6 in America. More impressively, on a per-screen average basis, it was actually the #2 movie in the entire country during its first week, making more money per theater than blockbusters like E.T., First Blood, and An Officer and a Gentleman. Secret "Under the Table" Screenings Shortly after the launch, Jensen Farley Pictures went bankrupt, causing them to completely stop tracking and reporting the film's ticket sales after just 17 days. However, because the movie was filling seats, hundreds of local, independent theater owners refused to send the film reels back. Instead, they kept screening The Last Unicorn for six to seven months—and in some rural towns, for an entire year—pocketing the unreported cash. International Dominance While the American theatrical run became a legal mess, the film's international release was structured entirely differently. In Europe, the movie was an absolute juggernaut. As noted by author Peter S. Beagle's business manager in an interview with Aaron Golden, the film's “1983 German/Swiss release out-grossed Star Wars.” To this day, the film remains a massive theatrical holiday tradition in Germany (under the title Das letzte Einhorn), where it has been played in cinemas or broadcast on television almost every single winter since 1983.

4 days, 19 hours ago

Agent Kermit D. Fonz added 2 items to Why the Box Office Bomb?: Films of 1980s: 1982 list

4 days, 20 hours ago

Agent Kermit D. Fonz voted for an image

4 days, 20 hours ago

Agent Kermit D. Fonz added 3 items to Why The Box Office?: Films of 1980s: 1982 list

4 days, 20 hours ago

Agent Kermit D. Fonz added 2 items to Why The Box Office?: Films of 1980s: 1982 list

4 days, 23 hours ago

Agent Kermit D. Fonz added 1 item to Why the Box Office?: Films of 1980s: 1981 list

Production Budget: $900,000 – $1,000,000 A modest sum for the time, allowing the film to be shot in just three weeks at Santa Barbara Mission High School.Los Angeles Box Office Gross: $411,292 Generally in just its first week and a half following its January 15, 1982 release in L.A. alone. First Week: L.A. Peak Overall : $500,000. Over half its budget in localized momentum during early screenings. Opening Weekend Over: $400,000. a surprise “hit" status within its limited regional rollout. Financial Success Structure Low Risk, High Return: For independent films during the 1980s horror boom, a small $1 million budget meant the movie did not need mainstream block-busting numbers to succeed. By pulling in nearly half its production costs from just a single major city market early on, it quickly crossed into profitability. The B-Movie Safety Net: Independent subdistributors used Evilspeak to "fill gaps". If a major studio film failed or left an empty theater slot, theater managers would quickly lease Evilspeak to pull in late-night horror crowds, securing steady cash flows over a staggered, multi-month release schedule. The Ultimate VHS Lifeline:

While its theater box office was deemed a localized win, the movie made back its budget multiple times over via international home video sales, boosted massively by its controversial "video nasty" ban in the UK. Audiences flocked to see Evilspeak (1981) in theaters and later rented it on VHS for a few specific reasons, ranging from its unique marketing hook to its intense, headline-grabbing gore. The "Satanic Computer" Hook In 1981, home computers were a mysterious, rapidly emerging technology. Evilspeak capitalized on this novelty by combining ancient black magic with modern technology. The film's highly effective marketing tagline, "EVILSPEAK...A Computer Programmed For Unspeakable Terror," deeply intrigued audiences. The premise of an Apple II computer generating a digital Black Mass and printing out warnings like "Data incomplete... Human blood required" was a concept moviegoers hadn't seen before. A Massive, Extreme Gore Climax During the 1980s horror boom, fans actively sought out movies that pushed boundaries. While the first hour of Evilspeak plays out like a slow-burn drama, word-of-mouth spread about its unbelievably chaotic, ultra-violent final 15 minutes. The climax featured: A levitating Clint Howard wielding a medieval sword. Exploding heads and a character's heart being physically ripped out. An apocalyptic pack of demonic, flesh-eating hogs tearing through a church. The Ultimate "Underdog Revenge" Narrative The film structure heavily manipulated viewers into wanting to see the villains get destroyed. Clint Howard played Stanley Coopersmith, a friendless, orphaned military cadet who is relentlessly tormented by sadistic classmates, cruel teachers, and a mean coach. Horror fans flocked to it as a "gender-flipped Carrie set at a military academy," especially after the bullies cross the line by killing Stanley's beloved puppy, ensuring the audience was actively rooting for his satanic revenge. The Allure of Being "Banned" While it was a modest success in theaters, its primary viewership boom happened on home video because it was legally banned. When the United Kingdom branded it an official "video nasty" under the 1984 Video Recordings Act, it created a massive "Streisand Effect." Horror fans globally sought out bootleg VHS tapes simply to see what the government didn't want them to watch.

4 days, 23 hours ago

Agent Kermit D. Fonz added 1 item to Why The Box Office?: Films of 1980s: 1982 list

The 1982 action thriller Firefox (1982) had a production budget of $21 million and a total box office gross of $46.7 million. Production budget: $21M budget Opening weekend: $8,152,948 Total box office gross: $46,708,276 The 1982 techno-thriller film Firefox, directed by and starring Clint Eastwood, is widely discussed regarding its box office performance because it was a modest financial success but a franchise failure. While it grossed $46.7 million domestically against a $21 million budget, it did not perform well enough to justify sequels, making it Eastwood’s only attempt at launching a high-tech, special effects-driven blockbuster franchise. The Bottom Line on Its Box Office & Reception High Production Costs: At $21 million, it was the costliest and largest production ever attempted at the time by Eastwood’s production company, Malpaso. Over $20 million of the resources were poured entirely into pioneering special effects, specifically hiring Star Wars effects expert John Dykstra to create the intense aerial sequences. Pacing Complaints: Critics praised the film for its “special effects, flying scenes, and thriller aspects, although critics took issue with the film's pacing, running time, and character development.” Word of mouth spread that the movie was "boring" during its first two-thirds, which was heavily focused on slow-moving Cold War espionage rather than the promised high-flying dogfights. The "Firefox Down" Sequel Cancellation: The movie was based on a Craig Thomas novel. While Thomas published a direct sequel book called Firefox Down in 1983, Warner Bros. and Eastwood chose not to adapt it into a second film due to the original’s lukewarm critical reception and sluggish theatrical momentum. Because of this, Firefox remains a unique, expensive anomaly in Clint Eastwood's filmography, a rare moment where the box-office superstar swapped grounded human dramas for Star Wars-style cinematic technology.

5 days ago

Agent Kermit D. Fonz voted for an image

5 days, 3 hours ago

Agent Kermit D. Fonz added 1 item to Why the Box Office Bomb?: Films of 1980s: 1982 list

Francis Ford Coppola’s 1982 romantic musical One from the Heart failed because its production costs ballooned to $26 million while earning a meager $637,355 at the U.S. box office. Financial and Production Overruns Coppola wanted creative freedom after directing Apocalypse Now. He purchased an old Hollywood studio for his company, Zoetrope Studios, to build an alternative to the major studio system. Budget Explosion: The film started as a modest $15 million project. It grew to $26 million because Coppola built massive, elaborate physical sets and miniatures of Las Vegas inside his soundstages. Self Financing Risk: Coppola funded the film himself. When the movie bombed, it bankrupted his studio and saddled him with massive debts that took a decade to pay off. As noted by The Quietus, “Coppola had intended to keep costs low by shooting on soundstages; instead, they ballooned from around $12 million to $26 million.” Narrative and Audience Disconnect Audiences and critics in 1982 rejected the movie's style and story. Unconvincing Romance: Many viewers felt the main couple, Hank and Frannie, lacked chemistry and emotional warmth. Stylistic Overload: The focus shifted heavily toward technical spectacle, neon colors, and music by Tom Waits rather than grounded human drama. Cultural Timing: The film arrived just as Hollywood shifted toward high-concept blockbusters, making a stylized, artificial stage musical feel out of touch. According to The Spool, the film was “a gargantuan gamble by an unstoppable auteur, one which tests the limits of studio largesse and the patience of audiences who aren't on the artist's incredibly specific wavelength.” The 41-Theater Ghost Town The box office environment was made even bleaker by the film’s distribution strategy. After disastrous test screenings, Paramount Pictures backed out of distributing the movie. When Columbia Pictures stepped in, they completely abandoned plans for a massive national launch. Instead, they dumped the film into just 41 theaters across the United States. Because it wasn't playing in standard neighborhood multiplexes, most of the country literally could not buy a ticket even if they wanted to.. As Joe Valdez notes for Video Days, “The movie is too unusual to open in 714 theaters on the same day... One From the Heart opened February 12, 1982 in 41 theaters in the U.S.” With zero momentum and confusing word-of-mouth, the film plummeted to 18th place on the box office charts by its second weekend, earning a dismal $180,717. Seeing the writing on the wall, Coppola famously pulled the movie from theaters entirely to prevent further financial bleeding. The bleak response to One from the Heart extended beyond the empty box office—contemporary film critics fiercely attacked the movie for prioritizing advanced technology and flashing lights over human connection. The critical consensus at the time agreed that Francis Ford Coppola had completely lost touch with emotional storytelling For regular 1982 audiences, One from the Heart felt incredibly alienating because it was a radical, experimental art film disguised as a traditional romantic musical. Moviegoers expecting a grounded love story or a fun, upbeat musical were instead met with a highly stylized, melancholic dream world. Audiences at the time rejected the movie for three major reasons: Unlikable, Low-Energy Characters Traditional musicals usually feature sweeping, charismatic romances. In contrast, One from the Heart focused on Hank and Frannie—a deeply unhappy, working-class couple who spent the movie fighting, drifting apart, and having unglamorous arguments. Audiences found it difficult to root for them, making the overall experience feel emotionally draining and "bleak." A Disconnection from the Cast Because Coppola was obsessed with his massive neon sets, he frequently used wide shots to show off the scenery rather than close-ups of the actors' faces. Audiences felt physically and emotionally distanced from the performers, feeling more like they were watching a distant theatre stage production rather than an intimate movie. The Sudden Shift in Movie Culture By 1982, audience tastes were rapidly shifting toward fast-paced, high-concept entertainment. One from the Heart was slow, poetic, and entirely driven by Tom Waits' gritty jazz soundtrack. It was a massive tonal mismatch for what 1980s pop culture wanted at that exact moment. How Audiences Feel About It Now Modern viewers see the film through a completely different lens. Free from the 1982 media storm about its budget, today's audiences can appreciate its stunning visual artistry. Rotten Tomatoes Audience Score: The movie holds a 61% Audience Score, showing that modern viewers find it far more watchable and visually dazzling than the original crowd did. Cult Following: Film fans now celebrate it as a beautiful, neon-soaked valentine to old Hollywood romance, rather than a depressing story about a broken relationship. Granted, it was released in 1981. But didn’t get a wider (If you wish to call it that.) release. Regardless, a year by any other year, the result was still the same. A heart breaking failure in theatres.

5 days, 3 hours ago

Agent Kermit D. Fonz added 2 items to Why The Box Office?: Films of 1980s: 1982 list

5 days, 3 hours ago

« Prev12 3 4 5 6 7 » 17 » 667 Next »

Pictures

View all pictures

Collection stats

	Watched	Want to watch
Movies	5013	70
TV	935	3

	Owned	Wanted	Used
DVDs	1600	46
Books	16	34	58
Music	136	464	3747
Games	3		7

Recently added

Ron Leibman

Added to list 1 week ago

Donovan

Added to list 3 weeks ago

April Fool's Day

Added to Watched list 1 month ago

Manhunt in the City

Added to Watched list 2 months ago

Missing in Action 2: The Beginning

Added to Wanted list 2 months ago

Xin nan quan bei tui

Added to Wanted list 2 months ago

Daniel Hugh Kelly

Added to list 2 months ago

Phantom of the Paradise (Original Soundtrack Recor...

Added to Owned list 2 months ago

Agent Kermit D. Fonz has 266 friends

geraldyn

50 points

desireu47

744 points

bobo93

46173 points

fdlm4000

78687 points

swymala

70 points

Kyle Ellis

387434 points

Defenestrated Jack

46454 points

omnivorousrex

45277 points

williamm83

10685 points

G̲lσb̶∆L J̅∆zZ∆l!s̲↱

927759 points

feradas327jin

80 points

somarasonder

53 points

View all of Agent Kermit D. Fonz's friends

Comments

TrekMedic

Posted: 1 week ago at Sep 5 1:06

Summer's almost over! Time for one more dip in the pool?

www.listal.com/list/ive-seen-pose-144

As always, thanks for all the votes and comments! Your continued support is always appreciated!!

TrekMedic

Posted: 2 weeks, 4 days ago at Aug 25 2:38

Thanks for the Shelley Fabares pic vote.

Campagnola

Posted: 2 weeks, 4 days ago at Aug 25 0:34

Thank you for the pic. votes!

remingtonsteel

Posted: 2 weeks, 5 days ago at Aug 24 1:29

Thanks for your picture vote.

TrekMedic

Posted: 2 months, 2 weeks ago at Jun 25 0:41

Summer's here! The temperatures are starting to get a little steamy:

www.listal.com/list/moistureproof

And be careful who you meet at the beach or go for a swim,...

www.listal.com/list/seduced-song-siren

As always, thanks for all the votes and comments! Your continued support is always appreciated!!

TrekMedic

Posted: 3 months, 2 weeks ago at May 28 1:49

As they say each year ahead of the Oscar nominations: "For your consideration:"

www.listal.com/list/1968-epic-year-movies

As always, thanks for all the votes and comments! Your continued support is always appreciated!!

TrekMedic

Posted: 5 months ago at Apr 11 22:26

Voting for this list is the only logical course of action:

www.listal.com/list/tpring-woman-broke-spocks-heart

As always, thanks for all the votes and comments! Your continued support is always appreciated!! Live long and prosper!

Campagnola

Posted: 5 months, 2 weeks ago at Mar 27 16:26

Thank you for the pic. votes.

TrekMedic

Posted: 5 months, 3 weeks ago at Mar 24 16:58

Thanks for the Nell Tiger Free and Sydney Chandler pic votes.

Campagnola

Posted: 5 months, 3 weeks ago at Mar 19 16:59

Thank you for the pic. votes!

TrekMedic

Posted: 8 months, 1 week ago at Jan 6 1:43

New Year? New List! You know the rules,...make your choices known!

www.listal.com/list/ask-trekmedics-2026-most-desirable

As always, thanks for all the votes and comments! Your continued support for this and my other polls is always appreciated!!

ToonHead2102

Posted: 8 months, 1 week ago at Jan 2 6:17

Listal wasn't working for me last night, wishing all my friends a very...

TrekMedic

Posted: 8 months, 1 week ago at Jan 2 1:20

Wishing everyone a happy, healthy and prosperous New Year!

TrekMedic

Posted: 8 months, 3 weeks ago at Dec 25 15:37

Merry Christmas to you and yours

ToonHead2102

Posted: 8 months, 3 weeks ago at Dec 25 4:42

Wishing all my friends a very...

ToonHead2102

Posted: 10 months, 1 week ago at Nov 3 15:56

I'm late getting to this, sorry...

TrekMedic

Posted: 10 months, 3 weeks ago at Oct 20 0:35

Time to induct a few more celebrities into the Tao-Tao-Tau Sorority House:

www.listal.com/list/the-tao-of-shay-mitchell
www.listal.com/list/tao-christen-harper

As always, thanks for all the votes and comments! Your continued support is always appreciated!!

TrekMedic

Posted: 1 year ago at Sep 5 1:00

College football started over the Labor Day weekend and professional football starts tonight, so the only question left to ask is ARE YOU READY FOR SOME FOOTBALL??

www.listal.com/list/school-spirits

As always, thanks for all the votes and comments! Your continued support is always appreciated!!

TrekMedic

Posted: 1 year, 1 month ago at Aug 6 0:41

Something old, something new, but these jeans, they're still blue!

www.listal.com/list/lookalikes-part-iii
www.listal.com/list/lookalikes-part-vi

As always, thanks for all the votes and comments! Your continued participation in these and all of my polls is always appreciated!!

TrekMedic

Posted: 1 year, 4 months ago at Apr 20 3:17

Easter blessings to you and your family!